[Qt-interest] Qt State machine framework

[Sean Harmer]

On Thursday 25 March 2010 11:23:06 Kent Hansen wrote:
> After each micro-step. configurationChanged() would not be the right
> name, then, since it's possible that a step is taken without the
> configuration actually changing. Another possibility would be to emit
> signals for exitStates() and enterStates(), should that be more directly
> useable.
> I've created http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-9380 for this,
> feel free to comment / vote / add use-cases (that goes for you too of
> course, Mandeep :-) ).

Thanks Kent. Voted for, watching it, and added a couple of use cases.

Sean