[Qt-interest] Qt as true mobile multi-platform framework.
David Ching
dc at remove-this.dcsoft.com
Fri Nov 5 07:14:16 CET 2010
With respect, Qt is not as relevant as a "true multi-platform framework" as
it was prior to the dominance of iPhone and Android, which together with RIM
make up almost all of the mobile market in the US. Symbian is non-existent
in the US, and Mameo and MeeGo are unknown quantities (are they even
released yet?) that may or may not succeed. I don't see how you can ignore
(or leave to "unofficial ports" the dominant market share of iPhone and
Android) and seriously call it true multi-platform.
Which is too bad considering there is nothing else that is, either. Best on
paper at least is Silverlight, which can target Windows (native), Mac
(native), Linux (through Moonlight?), iPhone (through MonoTouch), and
Windows Phone 7 (native). Then we read this week that MS is repositioning
Silverlight and its only true cross platform support will be through HTML5,
meaning we will probably never see Silverlight on Android.
Seems like there isn't enough money for anyone to write a true
multi-platform framework for all significant desktop and mobile OS's. :-(
-- David
"Constantin Makshin" wrote in message
news:201011041319.22577.cmakshin at gmail.com...
Qt already works on most desktop platforms, Symbian (Symbian^3 has Qt
available out-of-the-box, Symbian^4 is going to replace numerous old GUI
libraries with Qt), [dead] Windows Mobile (AFAIK, native applications are
no-no on Windows Phone 7, so it's unlikely that Qt will be available there),
Maemo and MeeGo. There are unofficial ports of Qt to Android and iPhone.
Looking at that list, I'd say Qt is already [one of] the most portable
toolkit[s]. From my experience of using Qt on mobile platforms I can say
that most difficulties are caused by physical/hardware limitations of mobile
devices (small screens, input methods, etc.) you have to cope with and not
software ones.
So, I think, Qt can be called "true multi-platform framework" (the word
"mobile" is omitted intentionally).
> Paulo
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list