[Qt-interest] LGPL compliance poll
Josh
jnfo-c at grauman.com
Thu Sep 30 19:30:47 CEST 2010
Hello all,
I know this has been discussed at length, and have read the discussion,
and so don't want to bring out all the arguments again. I would simply
like to poll those who have 'closed-source' commercial apps on the list to
hear what they have done. I would especialy appreciate examples of what
wording to use for attribution to Qt.
So, what wording do you include in your Qt-based LGPL 'closed-source'
commercial program?
Thanks!
Josh
For reference: I'm going to sell a closed-source LGPL app to the general
public based on Qt. I am going to dynamically link. I am going to
redistribute Qt libs with my app. I will include a copy of the LGPL with
my app, as well as a copyright notice for Qt in the app (wording?). I plan
on referring users to nokia to download Qt as well as a notice that they
may request the Qt source from me. Anything I've missed?
P.S. I know 'closed source' isn't a technically correct description, I
simply mean that I'm not distributing the source of my LGPL app...
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list