[Qt-interest] Qt future ...

[Duane]

On 4/28/2011 8:49 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
> On 4/28/2011 7:24 AM, Duane wrote:
>> On 4/27/2011 6:48 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Em Wednesday, 27 de April de 2011, às 12:29:02, QtNext escreveu:
>>>> I don't wants to restart the big thread from March after the bad news
>>>> ...  But just wants to know if some good news (Thiago says that we don't
>>>> know all about that ...) are coming for Qt :
>>>
>>> I'm not going to discuss this with an anonymous person.
>>
>> Most of us have the same questions and aren't anonymous.  We have
>> several new products in the planning stage and the question came up
>> yesterday whether we should continue with Qt.  We would certainly prefer
>> to do so but some indication of future support would be useful.
>
> Seriously, what is the alternative? If you're writing for one platform
> then maybe it's easier but if you have to write for more than one
> platform I don't see a viable alternative.

I guess it depends on how you define viable.  One choice would be Java. 
  Another that we've discussed would be C#.