[Qt-interest] Qt future ...

[Paul Miller]

> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:17 PM, BRM <bm_witness at yahoo.com
> <mailto:bm_witness at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     Just saying, there are alternatives. Qt just happens to be the best
>     of its class
>     - the most portable, cleanest API, and wide-range of language
>     integrations.
>
> couldn't agree more..particularly about Qt having the cleanest API.

I did say "viable". Yes, there are other cross-platform toolkits, but I 
don't consider them "viable", at least for what I do.

My real point is the source-code to Qt will not suddenly "go away", no 
matter what happens. There is no reason to switch to something else if 
Nokia decides to just wash their hands of it.