[Qt-interest] [ANN] ODB C++ ORM adds support for Qt

[Stephen Kelly]

Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> Agree. Our goal with lazy pointers was to "blend in" as much as
> possible with the default Qt configuration. 

What?

That's a really odd argument. What does prefixing with a Q have to do with 
blending in? What do you mean blend in? Confuse people into thinking ODB and 
Qt are one and the same? 

Just call it ODBLazySharedPointer or ODB::LazySharedPointer. Whether Qt uses 
a namespace or not has no bearing on that whatsoever and claiming it does is 
really odd too.

Anyway, I didn't look into the library itself, so I don't have anything to 
say about it and I guess I'm off topic.

All the best,

Steve.