[Qt-interest] weird problem with QNetworkAccessManager and posting-requests
Benjamin
bebl at mageta.org
Fri Apr 29 16:27:18 CEST 2011
Am 28.04.2011 09:38, schrieb Mandeep Sandhu:
> Hmmm...the FIN flag would mean the client aborted or tore down its TCP
> connection, right? And probably that explains why the finished signal
> is not emitted.
>
> Could there be any other code path where you're aborting this request?
>
> As for the double append, i have no clue. :/
>
> Does this webserver support GET request for the same action (the one
> you're trying to do with POST)? If it does, maybe you can check to see
> if GET behaves properly.
>
Yes, it is most likely that the signal is not sent, because the fin-flag
was set. But I don't even know how someone can influence this, in this
high-level-qt-abstraction. I mean, you don't have to deal with
tcp/ip/... although I could, but why cause myself more pain than I have to?
The included objects are only connected through the finished-signal of
the QNetworkAccessManager. As I said, I'm not aware of any other
possible concurrent-situation in my program. There are only 2 threads,
the main-gui-thread which idles during network-operations (the gui
itself is deactivated), and the network-worker-thread, which runs its
own cycle to process the signals of the QNetworkAccessManager. But while
the request is sent, there is no other activity in my code. The method
does 'return' immediately after the request is sent.
My own web-server can use GET, 'cause I can make him to :D. But I don't
have this access on the "production-server".
Meanwhile I dug out some old windows-machine and the problem does also
occur with the binary build of qt on windows.
best regards,
- Ben
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list