[Qt-interest] problem using sockets and threads
pmqt71
pmqt71 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 9 17:05:29 CET 2011
So I could use socket's signal-slots, bytesAvailable, waitForReadyRead
etc.. to achieve non-blocking I/O, right?
But I think I should avoid instructions like:
while (pSocket->bytesAvailable() < blockSize) {
if (!pSocket->waitForReadyRead(timeout)) {
...
because a slow client may take time to send the entire message causing
the other to wait (this is the reason why I was using threads). Of
course if you have other hints...
I'm trying.
thanks
pm
2011/2/9 Thiago Macieira <thiago at kde.org>:
> On Tuesday, 8 de February de 2011 23:47:00 pmqt71 wrote:
>> AFAIK in a single threaded socket app, a slow
>> client will degrade performances for all the clients.
>> Is Qt able to provide a kind of socket IO parallelism with no threads?
>
> Of course. Asynchronous and non-blocking I/O have been done on Unix since the
> dawn of time (well, of time_t anyway).
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
> Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
> PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
> E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at qt.nokia.com
> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
>
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list