[Qt-interest] Many have not aware about this letter, Its for all who relies on Nokia

[qt next]

I hopes we will have a clear word about the future of Qt.... If it was not
bought by Nokia : at this time Qt will certainly port to android, to match
qt everywhere... It seems it's clearly not a technical problem, but more a
choice.
I am not also a business startegist ...but for me, if Nokia go to WP7 a port
of Qt to WP7 is a must have to ensure to Nokia a fast shift to another
platform if needed in the futur (who knows ... 1 year later the revolution
with meego, 6 month latter the revolution with Symbian + Meego : a ecosystem
....

just some previous comment of Elop on Qt, Meego :

http://conversations.nokia.com/2010/02/15/nokia-and-intel-create-meego-for-new-era-of-mobile-computing/

http://conversations.nokia.com/2010/10/21/stephen-elop-talks-nokia-qt-and-meego/

http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/01/27/stephen-elop-talks-strengths-successes-and-the-future/
(for the developer ... don't know ... can change :(

... .And now...  :(


2011/2/11 Mikael Helbo Kjær <mhk at designtech.dk>

> > 11.02.2011, 11:11, "kaolite gmail" <kaolite at gmail.com>:
> > > incredible ... silly ! meego to the trash ... and WP7 instead .. a
> > none sense !!
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Especially taking into account that WP7 is not really successful on the
> > market
>
> And it won't be in my opinion. It is not that it is not innovative or
> pretty, it may a bit too controlled (according to some articles I've read MS
> dictates a lot about the hardware of the phone even down to the design) but
> it is mostly too late. Nokia does provide MS with a partner in phones
> outside of HTC whose big sellers are currently Android phones in this but
> Nokia is not really "big" with regards to modern smartphones. RIM and HP
> with their alternative platforms are struggling to make a big impact and RIM
> at least used to be a big player. WP7 would have to seriously out-innovate
> Android and iOS at this point to prevent Android becoming the equivalent of
> the Windows of the current Mobile age (however it is a more dynamic market
> than the desktop market with regards to replacements) and that is not
> looking likely even with Nokia's help. Business types and investors will
> like this and I think it will positively affect Nokia's stock prices, but
> really if the entire reason fo
>  r Nokia not to use Android was to distinguish itself and not be reliant on
> Google, how is WP7 an improvement (outside of course that the new manager of
> Nokia is an old Microsoft manager)?
>
> On the Qt front you'd have to fear the eventual erosion and possible slow
> death of Qt Software as a department of Nokia. It is not strategically well
> placed with regards to the new WP7 strategy which is clearly tied to
> Windows. A MS/Nokia alliance would naturally become about C# (which is the
> access level most app developers have on WP7 AFAIK) not native C++ and
> definitely not about being cross-platform.
>
> Nokia never seemed to have much interest in being a desktop software
> developer, this was the original fear of most of the naysayers when Nokia
> bought Trolltech and behold where it has invested a lot of its R&D: QML
> (best for Mobile at the moment and near future as well as clearly designed
> as an mobile app GUI platform), Webkit (so-so on both sides of the
> desktop/mobile fence), a massive Symbian extension of Qt (understandable,
> but not really helping much as Symbian is dead or people want it to be) and
> much improved dev-tools for C++ (clearly a win for both desktop and mobile).
> In the future if successful Nokia will "deprecate" Qt from their product
> list, not the death of the library but I would expect first layoffs and a
> development slow-down. In the case it is not successful then maybe by
> hedging their bets a little and riding along with Meego they might get a
> smaller boost again but I doubt it. At the very least this is unwelcome news
> for Nokia's Qt folks and over time this
>  could have ripples into the businesses of people here on the list and KDE
> (smaller consultancies and even a new Trolltech could popup to keep Qt the
> library alive but I doubt it would be the same).
>
> Given current market momentum I believe Qt would have been better served by
> having it be compatible with Android earlier on. That would have given more
> chance of apps being developed that could be crossed over to the
> Meego/Symbian world instead of going it alone. The compatibility could still
> happen through Lighthouse but I doubt it will help much at this point if not
> officially endorsed by Qt's developers and I wonder what the corporate
> leaders within Nokia would say to any part of their business supporting a
> cross-mobile strategy even if that was part of the original spirit of Qt.
>
> But then I am not a business strategist or do I know what is going on for
> real inside Nokia. So take all of this with a grain of salt.
>
> Regards,
> Mikael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at qt.nokia.com
> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20110211/566d0060/attachment.html