[Qt-interest] What is likely to be in Qt 4.8?

[Thiago Macieira]

On Tuesday, 22 de February de 2011 12:02:16 Jason H wrote:
> I'm not that disappointed. I think modularization would really help over a
> monolithic Qt release. Qt covers so many more technologies than it ever has.
> 
> That being said, I am surprised that you're making Qt SPARQLy when XQuery
> update support seems more useful? QDom supposedly has been on its way out
> for some time?

If a group of people who needs SPARQL makes a module, I can't tell them to go 
work on XQuery.

QDom is out (deprecated, can't be removed for binary compatibility reasons).

> I'm curious what will replace the FileEngine stuff? I've done some cool
> things with it.

QFileSystem. Take a look at the current 4.8.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20110222/6c5841b7/attachment.bin