[Qt-interest] article about static analysis of Qt

[Jesus Fernandez]

I think this article is completely unnecessary.

Qt libraries are huge and cannot be free of errors. But these comments...

On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 15:26, Bill Crocker <william.crocker at analog.com>wrote:

>
> >>
> >> http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0075/
> >
> > I was actually a bit disappointed with this.
> >
>
> He also says this...
>
>     "The code of the Qt library is of a very high
>      quality and it's almost free of errors."
>
> which reveals his limited Qt experience.    :-)
> Qt may have a low error count per line of code
> but there is a *lot* of code.
>
> Bill
>
> > Bo Thorsen,
> > Fionia Software.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at qt.nokia.com
> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20110717/d3130e21/attachment.html