[Qt-interest] VS 2010?
Paul Miller
paul at fxtech.com
Thu Mar 3 13:49:41 CET 2011
On 3/3/2011 4:14 AM, Philippe wrote:
>> Because I think that LGPL allow this, you need only to ship your patch
>> to the Qt sources to your client (or, to be complete, the Qt sources
>> patched).
>
> Yes, LGPL allows you to do this. But this is not very convenient, and
> for this sole reason, I prefer a Commercial license.
>
>> Open a bug report or share your modifications with the community is
>> something you are incouraged to, so you can share work with the
>> community as the community share with you. If you don't do this, you
>> are a selfish, on my point of view (I don't want to hurt anyone).
>
> This is what I do, and regularly. But in a number of cases, the bugs,
> even if reproducable and associated with a sample and a solution, are
> not taken into account with enough priority by the Qt team (from my
> point of view, of course), or it waits months for a resolution. What do
> I say to your clients in the mean time?
> Or a small feature change or addition is not accepted, while it means
> much for my case.
>
> This is a question of being pragmatic. Period.
As a commercial customer I also like the option of linking statically
when it makes sense.
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list