[Qt-interest] Is the bug reporting and merge requests workflow broken?

Raul Metsma raul at innovaatik.ee
Wed Mar 30 18:34:41 CEST 2011


Your in luck

its has been already over year for me
Bug opened 04/Feb/10
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-7912

http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/434 
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/2477
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/922

I even have commercial ticket (opened 1/27/2010), dunno what to say for this

Raul

On 30.03.2011, at 18:52, Chris Meyer wrote:

> I submitted a bug report, then fixed the bug, then submitted a merge
> request FOUR MONTHS ago. The bug is still open and the merge request
> is still not applied.
> 
> It's minor bug that appeared from 4.6 to 4.7 regarding small buttons
> on Mac OS. The bug is that Qt 4.7 is incorrectly assuming that every
> button is rounded like the default Mac OS buttons. And in the case of
> small (square) buttons, the corners of the button are excluded to the
> point where there is no way to process clicks in small buttons.
> 
> I took time out to fix the bug, submitted it via a bug report with an
> attached merge request. I wrote a test case so that the same bug is
> caught in future versions. What's the hold up in applying the merge?
> 
> For what it's worth: A great way to lose developers is to be totally
> unresponsive to bug reports and merge requests. Is Qt already going
> down that road?
> 
> Bug report: http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-13901
> 
> Merge request: https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/914
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at qt.nokia.com
> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20110330/66c93de5/attachment.html 


More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list