[Qt-interest] The argument for Qt

Scott Aron Bloom Scott.Bloom at onshorecs.com
Tue Oct 18 21:10:12 CEST 2011


But KDE can die, because of Gnome...

-----Original Message-----
From: qt-interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs.com at qt.nokia.com
[mailto:qt-interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs.com at qt.nokia.com] On
Behalf Of Nikos Chantziaras
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 3:05 PM
To: qt-interest at qt.nokia.com
Subject: Re: [Qt-interest] The argument for Qt

On 10/18/2011 09:23 PM, Bob Hood wrote:
> I have pointed to Qt's "open governance" as a move to protect it from 
> the corporate "chaos" and ensure that it remains an open, viable and 
> maintained toolkit. Again, not enough.
>
> Is there anything more I can site that I haven't?

KDE.  Just like Gtk can't die because of Gnome, .NET can't die because
of Windows, Cocoa can't die because of Mac OS X, Qt can't die because of
KDE.  Nokia could even try to actively kill Qt, but nothing will work
against it, because of KDE.

It's as simple as that.
_______________________________________________
Qt-interest mailing list
Qt-interest at qt.nokia.com
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest



More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list