[Qt-interest] The argument for Qt

[Bob Hood]

On 10/18/2011 2:54 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Am 18.10.2011 um 22:32 schrieb Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com
> <mailto:steveire at gmail.com>>:
>
>> , we are being
>>> serviced by
>>> Digia and its support /at this very moment/.  Not enough.
>>
>> Why is that not enough? Not enough information about digias commitment to
>> Qt? There are other Qt-expert companies capable of providing support (I work
>> for KDAB, though I don't speak for KDAB :) ).
>
> I understood "not enough" as in "not enough to convince his boss".
>

Indeed, yes, something along that line.  Digia's assumption of the commercial
duties for Qt is still only months-old, and yet to be proven (that it will
remain on the task for an extended amount of time).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20111018/d99621c3/attachment.html