[Qt-interest] The argument for Qt

Zeljko zeljko at holobit.net
Wed Oct 19 08:09:58 CEST 2011


Bob Hood wrote:

> The argument I keep coming up against is that Qt's future is uncertain for the
> desktop, and that we don't want to put ourselves in a hole with it as a
> result.  There are rumors (probably true) that Nokia will be terminating Qt
> development by the end of the year, and it is this sticking point that I am
> having a hard time getting past.

Don't worry about that. Qt won't die soon :) 

> 
> I have pointed out that the commercial end of the business is being handled by
> Digia, and since we actually maintain a license, we are being serviced by
> Digia and its support /at this very moment/.  Not enough.

Qt won't die  because of many reasons (KDE, many developers uses Qt ...etc). 
Digia is todays supporter, tomorrow can be someone else, or even Digia .... 
whatever.


zeljko






More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list