[Qt-jambi-interest] Should I merge the build branch into the master branch?

Francis Galiegue fgaliegue at gmail.com
Sat Dec 12 01:20:48 CET 2009


I haven't had any real feedback on the build branch so far, but I know
that it works fine with the current qt git branch (I have merged
Helge's changes into my branch).

It requires ant-contrib, unlike before. I have no real knowledge of
the qt-jambi "population" for now. My changes have been live for a few
months, and have been tested by me but little else. What should I do?

Should I get more people to test the build branch? Or shoulld I just
go with it and "push" all of my changes into the master branch? Either
solution makes me feel uneasy: the first solution because it requires
some knowledge of git; the second because if there are glaring bugs
that I have not encountered, they will be, rightly so, considered as
regressions. Not that regressions are really a problem with git, see
"git help bisect".

But I want the majority to agree. Please tell me. I, of course, would
prefer the second solution...

-- 
Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue at gmail.com
"It seems obvious [...] that at least some 'business intelligence'
tools invest so much intelligence on the business side that they have
nothing left for generating SQL queries" (Stéphane Faroult, in "The
Art of SQL", ISBN 0-596-00894-5)




More information about the Qt-jambi-interest mailing list