[Qt-jambi-interest] Some questions about Qt Jambi
Lists
lists at sibvisions.org
Thu Dec 31 14:13:58 CET 2009
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for the fast response!
>
> Which UI framework do you think has the most secure future in terms of
> compatibility with new operating systems and fixing bugs? While
> searching
> the net I found that there were a lot of people saying that Swing isn't
> updated for about 10 years or so. Is this true?
Tom and José have everything explained in detail.
If you plan to develop a commercial product than you should choose between
Swing and SWT, both have all what you need.
It depends on your skills and your time.
QT(Jambi) has better components than Swing and is easy to use and also
good for commercial products. The problem is that the community still needs
some time to handle all "without" nokia.
We are only at the beginning.
>
> I think it will be a choice between SWT or Qt Jambi... Not sure which
> one to
> pick...
>
> The UFaceKit you pointed out also looks interesting but then I still
> need to
> choose a UI framework to start with :-). Will UFaceKit work with things
> like
> charts? Or more advanced stuff like drag & drop?
There's also another framework with which you can develop UI independent
applications.
It's called JVx and is developed by my company.
It's designed to create enterprise applications, with databases. The UI is
technology independent
and interfaced based. An implementation for Swing exists.
We also developed a QT Jambi implementation (the first beta will be released
in January 2010).
The only problem, now, is that the webpage is German, and the English
translation is not finished.
You can try out the demo applications which are available in English
(http://www.sibvisions.com/de/jvxmdemo),
and the image: http://www.sibvisions.com/de/jvxmdokumentation/85-jvxsysarch
shows the system architecture.
>
> Kind regards,
> Bruno Wouters
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Schindl [mailto:listom at bestsolution.at]
> Sent: dinsdag 29 december 2009 10:45
> To: Bruno Wouters
> Cc: qt-jambi-interest at trolltech.com
> Subject: Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] Some questions about Qt Jambi
>
> Hi,
>
> Not sure what to suggest when it comes to whether using Qt-Jambi in
> commercial product but there are alternatives naturally:
>
> * Swing
> * SWT integrates nicely on Win32 and MacOS-X as well as on Linux-Gnome
>
> I can point you also to a project I started some time ago named
> UFaceKit
> [1,2] which is hiding the real toolkit behind a facade and so allows
> you
> to defers the choice of the UI-ToolKit.
>
> LGPL is a quite commerical friendly license and even if you modify
> LGPL-Code you only have to contribute back the modified code and NOT
> publish your own (but I'm not a lawyer).
>
> It's really a bitty that Nokia took this step and on the other hand
> invested into a Qt-eSWT-Port on the other side. Please note eSWT !=
> SWT.
>
> Tom
>
> [1]http://wiki.eclipse.org/UFaceKit
> [2]http://tomsondev.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/slides1.pdf
>
> Am 29.12.09 10:20, schrieb Bruno Wouters:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm considering to use Qt Jambi for a new project. Is this a good
> choice
> > knowing that Nokia decided to discontinue development of it? Is the
> open
> > source community large enough to keep it alive/up to date?
> >
> > Are there other, better choices then Qt Jambi for a java application
> > that is going to be deployed on Windows and Mac OS X? It will be a
> > multilingual (also right-to-left languages) application taking care
> of
> > some administrative tasks (quite simple gui).
> >
> > And can I use Qt Jambi under the LGPL license (without changing the
> Qt
> > Jambi code) in a commercial application without providing the source
> > code of it?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your time!
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Bruno Wouters
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
> > Qt-jambi-interest at trolltech.com
> > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
> Qt-jambi-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
More information about the Qt-jambi-interest
mailing list