[Qt-jambi-interest] QT Jambi 4.5

[Tom Schindl]

Hi Eskil,

Ok - I fetched the sources, made my changes (adding the OSGi-Support)
but there's no documentation on gitorious.org how I can now push my
changes to my own repository (I didn't find any documentation on how I'm
supposed to do this) so that other could take a look.

Another problem I see is that Java-Classes generated from the C-Headers
are not part of the repository (e.g. com.trolltech.qt.core.QObject) but
have to be generated from the developer before all Java-Classes can get
compiled.

I know that things that can get generated should not be part of the
repository but if you want to lower the burden for developers to
contribute it would certainly make sense that the stuff one is checking
out from GIT compiles without any additional generation step (including
configuration, ...). This makes it much easier for a medium
Java-Developer to contribute to the project's Java-Code (like I added
support for OSGi which only needs changes in Java-Code).

I'd add a special comment in the Java-Files that they are generated
automatically and therefore changing them is senseless because
modifications are lost when they are generated the next time. I'd also
generated them to special-directory like "src/main/genjava" (See below
for directory-structure).

If NOT adding the autogenerated files to the repository a small
HOWTO-setup for Java-Development would be highly appreciated (I didn't
managed to get the code compiled because I didn't found out what I have
to call to get the files generated)

Another thing which would be nice for people like me who use an IDE is
that the JavaSources are in an extra-directory say "src/main/java" if
you want to follow the maven-naming scheme because then one can point
the IDE to this directory instead of the root of the project. This once
more makes it easier for standard java-developers to get started with
the project.

Another question I have is about the 64-bit. In the last release the
.class-Files have been the same for all platforms. Is this still true
now with 64-bit/32-bit support or are the 32bit and 64bit
specific-class-files?

Tom

Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt schrieb:
> Vítězslav Košina wrote:
>> on ftp.qtsoftware.com is QT-Jambi version 4.5 like file qtjambi-src -
>> lgpl-4.5.0_01.tar.gz.
>>
>> I haven't seen any announce. Is it real QT-Jambi 4.5 and development of QT-
>> Jambi will be done now by comunity?
>>   
> 
> Hi,
> 
> it's the real Qt Jambi 4.5 :-)
> 
> The release announcement just went out now.
> 
> Read my blog for more details:
> 
> http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/05/11/qt-jambi-450_01-released-contributors-wanted/
> 
> -- Eskil
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
> Qt-jambi-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest