[Qt-jambi-interest] Request for contributors

[José Arcángel Salazar Delgado]

> Hello, great to hear from you again!
> 
> Dusan Zatkovsky wrote:
> > Before I tell you about my work, read this:
> >
> > 	As a new developer, I am missing many basic informations, such as:
> >
> > 	- 	where is up-to-date main page of qtjambi? ( there are many old
> > 		informations on gitorious )
> >
> > 	... and questions follows up:
> >
> > 	-	what is current repository?
> >
> > 	-	how to contribute?
> > 		"Contributing to Qt Jambi" on wiki seems to be a little bit obsolete (
> > for example "Qt Jambi is currently under maintenance by Nokia Qt
> > Development Frameworks", ...)
> >
> > 	-	where is official tracker?
> > 		We can't exist without it. There must exist list of tasks to be done to
> > 		prevent duplicated work.
> >
> > 	I think we must consolidate this, because now sources are on gitorious,
> > 	_obsolete_ wiki is on gitorious, bugtracker is on sf.net, what else?
> >
> > 	Start talking about this problem, because without this we can't
> > cooperate.
> >
> > 	If we need to migrate to ONE complex site ( sources, web, wiki, tracker
> > ), just do that! There are many of them ( sf, google, tigris )
> > 	See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/\
> > 	Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities
> 
> Yes, since Nokia and the authors of Qt Jambi seems to have withdrawn
> from the
> project, at least from speaking officially on the list, I cannot see any
> reason why
> the project should continue to live under their "wings".
> 
> Although I like the gitorious interface a lot, there seems to be support
> for git on
> sourceforge as well. So I guess moving the repo over to SF should be the
> correct
> thing to do for tidyness. Do anyone have any experience with git on
> sourceforge?
> How does it work?
> 
> Also, wiki info on the project found on gitorious should be updated and
> moved
> over to SF. I think Rene is working on setting up a proper web page for
> us on
> SF, correct? When you have a workbench up for us, some more can start
> putting
> things in there.
> 
> > Now back to my work:
> >
> > I have made some simpler "release" scripts, which will create .tar.gz
> > with qtjambi distribution ( contains jars, designer, juic, linguist ) to
> > learn how thinks works ( designer was a tricky job, thanks Eskil for help
> > ), but currently I have no time to maintain it.
> 
> If no-one else is willing to put up a release on Linux, I will do it, no
> problem.
Actually, I'm working in compiling qt jambi in kubuntu 9.04.
After I obtain a sucessfull build I can start working extending some class of 
qt jambi or porting some classes.

Also I have a question. what wiki we will use, mediawiki or the trac wiki ? 
While I'm waiting the compilation of qt I can port the wiki pages of gitorious 
to the new wiki.
> Can you commit your work on the designer, and maybe the release building
> script on the gitorious? If not, send it to me on my mail.
> 
> > -	is it possible to split qtjambi to smaller jars ( core, gui, ... ) like
> > in c++?
> 
> I guess this is a discussion for the long run.
> 
> > -	original 4.5 sources are "chaotic", it need some rearrangement.
> > 	It is hard to identify sources, generated sources and targets,
> > everything builds together in the same directories ( aaaargh ).
> > 	Maybe this have been done by Francis currently, I don't know... (?)
> 
> Francis was working hard on "tidying things up", hope he will join in
> again soon.
> 
> Helge
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
> Qt-jambi-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
>