[Qt-qml] Bad docs
Jason H
scorp1us at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 20 19:48:42 CEST 2010
I just wanted to apologize on-list if any of my messages have offended anyone. I
often forget that my sense of humor cannot be appreciated to its fullest extent
when it is reduced to the typed word.
I at times vent a little frustration here and there, and when I do I hope
people do take as far as to see it as an opportunity to make things better, but
nothing more. I think that anything that I try to do will be attempted by
others. I don't mind being an early adopter, and I do expect early adoption
pains. I do however appologise if anything I've said has come across as
unprofessional. I am nothing but ecstatic at QML. I have the highest hopes for
QML, and highest regards for the trolls (and anyone else here), and my
criticism is meant to be nothing but constructive.
I look forward to a long relationship and bright future with everyone here. I'm
sorry if I've insulted, slighted, defamed, maimed, short changed, or estranged
anyone on this list, directly or indirectly.
Regards,
Jason
----- Original Message ----
From: "warwick.allison at nokia.com" <warwick.allison at nokia.com>
To: scorp1us at yahoo.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 10:33:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Qt-qml] Bad docs
As much as Nokia Qt employees would love to be able to answers every "how to"
query straight away, we obviously cannot. But that's the purpose of this list -
it's great to see so many clever people here who are "early adopting" QML and
supporting each other in that process.
By all means report a doc bug and ask a question at the same time.
And of course, always feel welcome to answer someone else's questions!
--
Warwick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jason H [mailto:scorp1us at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 11:37 AM
> To: Allison Warwick (Nokia-MS-Qt/Brisbane); Jones Martin (Nokia-MS-
> Qt/Brisbane); qt-qml at trolltech.com
> Subject: Re: [Qt-qml] Bad docs
>
> So I should stop holding my breath? LOL
>
> So if the correction was done.. what would it look like? I feel I am
> close to being able to tear through some QML, but this dymanic stuff is
> throwing me for a loop.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: "warwick.allison at nokia.com" <warwick.allison at nokia.com>
> To: scorp1us at yahoo.com; martin.jones at nokia.com; qt-qml at trolltech.com
> Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 8:29:26 PM
> Subject: RE: [Qt-qml] Bad docs
>
> > When will I be able to see the corrected page?
>
> It can take up to 25 hours for the docs to be regenerated, once the
> change makes it from the qt-qml git repo to the qt master repo (which
> can take from 1 hour to 2 weeks, depending on auto-test regressions).
>
> You're of course free to checkout the qt-qml repo and run "make docs"
> to get your own local copy of the docs. Then you'll get changes within
> an hour of the bug being closed.
>
> Whereas mail to this list, or the IRC channel means you MIGHT get a
> response within seconds... but even if you do, if the docs are not also
> updated you'll have to hear other people asking your question again
> over and over for 10 years ;-)
>
> --
> Warwick
>
More information about the Qt-qml
mailing list