[Qt5-feedback] QAnchorLayout

[Thiago Macieira]

Em Saturday, 4 de June de 2011, às 11:40:32, Philippe escreveu:
> BTW, with the new open source/governance approach, what happens if some
> "external" programmers bring a good class in a domain which is 'done',
> as widgets' domain is. Is it rejected or accepted (as far as the stuff
> is good, of course).

http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/05/03/qt-modules-maturity-level/

Done
* Maintaining stability is the most important objective for the maintainer
* Maintainer must ensure code “works” (e.g. compiles, passes tests, etc.)
* Work will not be performed that adds new features or improves performance
* P0 and P1 bugs are being fixed
* Contributions that aren’t related to P0 and P1 bug reports may be 
reluctantly accepted by the maintainer

It's up to the maintainer to decide whether to accept new features in Done 
modules. They will be required to be extensively tested, of course, and the 
maintainer will have to judge the risk of adding it versus possibility of 
introducing regressions and stability issues.

As current maintainers, we probably won't accept adding any new classes into 
the core. We want people to focus on how to bring QML to the desktop and do 
what the widget classes do, better and more.

Other maintainers may choose different. Anyone lining up? You can start by 
looking at the bug reports in bugreports.qt.nokia.com and begin fixing P2s and 
P3s.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt.nokia.com/pipermail/qt5-feedback/attachments/20110604/c70e5830/attachment.bin