[Qt5-feedback] Make some undocumented features documented

[Thiago Macieira]

On Tuesday, 24 de May de 2011 14:20:50 BRM wrote:
> Well, since we're mentioning those things, if it doesn't exist already, how
> about a Q_PROTECTED_SLOT too. I have a number of classes that could really
> use protected slots. Same for signals - Q_PRIVATE_SIGNAL and
> Q_PROTECTED_SIGNAL would be very beneficial.

Signals are always protected in Qt 4. In Qt 5, this may change.

What's a Q_PROTECTED_SLOT for you? And how is this different from "protected 
slots:" ?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt.nokia.com/pipermail/qt5-feedback/attachments/20110524/0f7498d0/attachment.bin