[Releasing] SPDY feature in Qt 5.3

[Peter Hartmann]

On 02/14/2014 05:47 PM, Hirvonen Olli wrote:
> (...)
> I quickly discussed this on phone with Tuukka and conclusion was same as
> Frederik wrote. You met the deadline and you can fix this with Tony next
> week to stable.

OK cool, I will proceed with that next week unless I hear otherwise then...

Thanks,

Peter

>
> Br, Olli
>
> Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn at digia.com
> <mailto:frederik.gladhorn at digia.com>> kirjoitti 14.2.2014 kello 17.07:
>
>> Fredag 14. februar 2014 15.28.22 skrev Peter Hartmann:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am having problems with getting the commit in that adds SPDY
>>> functionality to QtNetwork ([1]). The problem is not the commit itself,
>>> but the network test server apparently not installing the module for the
>>> server correctly ([*], [2]).
>>> I have tried to deploy the module for the server on my own test server
>>> setup, and all auto tests work fine there; but since I don't have access
>>> to the machines on the CI system, it is hard for me to investigate what
>>> is going on.
>>>
>>> I wonder whether it would be possible to get the commit in before the
>>> feature freeze anyhow by making the auto tests insignificant for now?
>>
>> Since we generally get tests to pass, I'd rather not disable any of
>> them, not
>> even for new code.
>>
>> The patch was ready before the feature freze, so I'd rather have you
>> work with
>> Tony on getting the tests working and submit the patch to the stable
>> branch if
>> the deadline is missed because of the tests not working in time.
>>
>> (note, I'm not part of the release team, just suggesting this)
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Frederik
>>
>>>
>>> The new functionality is opt-in (i.e. not used by default), and given
>>> that the current network auto tests still work (and would be tested when
>>> cherry-picking the commit), there would be a low risk of breaking
>>> existing code.
>>>
>>> Please let me know what you think, I guess ultimately Lars has to decide
>>> whether this is possible or not (or maybe somebody else, I don't know).
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> [*] For some strange reason, the tests pass on one machine [3] and fails
>>> on another [4]
>>>
>>> [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/77480
>>> [2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/77620
>>> [3]
>>> http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/QtBase_dev_Integration/build_02931/linu
>>> x-g++_no-widgets_Ubuntu_12.04_x64/log.txt.gz [4]
>>> http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/QtBase_dev_Integration/build_02931/linu
>>> x-g++_developer-build_qtnamespace_qtlibinfix_Ubuntu_11.10_x64/log.txt.gz
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Releasing mailing list
>>> Releasing at qt-project.org
>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Frederik Gladhorn
>> Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt
>> Visit us on:http://qt.digia.com <http://qt.digia.com/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Releasing mailing list
>> Releasing at qt-project.org <mailto:Releasing at qt-project.org>
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Releasing mailing list
> Releasing at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
>