[Releasing] qtwebkit 5.5.2 or 5.6.0
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Mon Nov 30 18:23:03 CET 2015
On Monday 30 November 2015 12:49:49 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Monday 30 November 2015 13:13:10 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > As for source tarballs I think we have so far not considered producing
> > tarballs as Jani writes, why do you see the necessity?
>
> Distributions who have lots of apps still using qtwebkit will simply love
> these tarballs. As a last resort we can create them from git but still
> better if we can use an upstream tarball.
That is a good reason. The other is the fact that our tarballs are not simple
equivalents of git archive, so there's some post-processing left-over that
some users will not realise they need.
Asking people to download from Git will lead them to download from GitHub:
https://github.com/qtproject/qtwebkit/archive/dev.zip
And we know the build from a git archive export does *not* *work*.
Please create the tarballs and upload them. They don't have to be built to
binary and they don't have to be part of the joined source code, but they will
need to exist.
And we'll need to keep releasing every time that we change qtbase in such a
way that breaks the build of those modules.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Releasing
mailing list