[Releasing] Deprecation - we are doing that wrong

Jędrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowacki at theqtcompany.com
Fri Feb 5 08:42:12 CET 2016

On Thursday 04 of February 2016 17:48:30 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:15:01PM +0100, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > On 04/02/16 15:11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > >that's entirely irrelevant if we skip tests for these modules during
> > >integration runs altogether, which is option C - the one i endorsed.
> > 
> > Ok, I thought you wanted option B. Option C is something we can
> > probably live with, at least for now. But it does have the problem
> > that we will loose all information about how well that module is
> > working in the longer term.
> that's why i suggested that we leave the tests on in state builds (where
> they don't block integration). we can arrange that later.
> _______________________________________________
> Releasing mailing list
> Releasing at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing

Ok, this is the action that we took yesterday (option C). Simon marked 
QtQtuick1 module in CI as one without tests (Thanks!)


More information about the Releasing mailing list