[Releasing] Deprecation - we are doing that wrong
Jędrzej Nowacki
jedrzej.nowacki at theqtcompany.com
Fri Feb 5 08:42:12 CET 2016
On Thursday 04 of February 2016 17:48:30 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:15:01PM +0100, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > On 04/02/16 15:11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > >that's entirely irrelevant if we skip tests for these modules during
> > >integration runs altogether, which is option C - the one i endorsed.
> >
> > Ok, I thought you wanted option B. Option C is something we can
> > probably live with, at least for now. But it does have the problem
> > that we will loose all information about how well that module is
> > working in the longer term.
>
> that's why i suggested that we leave the tests on in state builds (where
> they don't block integration). we can arrange that later.
> _______________________________________________
> Releasing mailing list
> Releasing at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
Ok, this is the action that we took yesterday (option C). Simon marked
QtQtuick1 module in CI as one without tests (Thanks!)
Cheers,
Jędrek
More information about the Releasing
mailing list