[Releasing] Meeting minutes from Qt Release Team meeting 28.09.2021

Jani Heikkinen jani.heikkinen at qt.io
Tue Sep 28 16:25:33 CEST 2021


Meeting minutes from Qt Release Team meeting Tue 28th September 2021

Qt 6.2 status:
- Qt 6.2.0 RC released 16th September 2021 and RC2 24th September 2021
- Qt 6.2.0 release content frozen and packages under testing
   * New blocker proposal reported: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-96916
      ** Qt release team agreed this isn't a blocker for Qt 6.2.0
--> We will release existing packages as Qt 6.2.0 Thu 30th September as planned

Next meeting tue 5th October 2021 16:00 CET  in libera.chat #qt-releases

Br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager

irc log below:
[17:00:56] <jaheikki3> akseli: ablasche:carewolf:larsk:thiago:ankokko:mapaaso:frkleint: ping
[17:01:02] <larsk> pong
[17:01:26] <frkleint> jaheikki3: pong
[17:02:03] <jaheikki3> Time to start qt release team meeting
[17:02:11] <jaheikki3> On agenda today:
[17:02:17] <jaheikki3> Qt 6.2 status
[17:02:27] <jaheikki3> Any additional item to the agenda?
[17:02:54] <carewolf> pong
[17:04:13] <jaheikki3> Ok, let's browse through Qt 6.2.0 status:
[17:04:33] <jaheikki3> Qt 6.2.0 RC released 16th September 2021
[17:04:44] <jaheikki3> and RC2 24th September 2021
[17:05:11] <jaheikki3> Qt 6.2.0 release content already frozen and packages created for testing
[17:05:36] <jaheikki3> Target is to release Qt 6.2.0 Thu 30th September as planned
[17:05:51] <jaheikki3> Unfortunately new blocker proposal reported yesterday: 
[17:06:00] <jaheikki3> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-96916
[17:06:40] <jaheikki3> So the question is can we live with it as known issue in Qt 6.2.0 or do we need to delay the release a while to get in fixed in Qt 6.2.0 ?
[17:06:40] -*- thiago reads
[17:06:59] <thiago> oh, that. I don't think it's a blockers
[17:07:13] <larsk> The bug has been there since 6.0,  which IMO speaks against it being a blocker for 6.2.0
[17:07:20] <carewolf> right so data compat
[17:07:36] <larsk> We should get it fixed for 6.2.1 though IMO
[17:08:07] <jaheikki3> That would be welcome
[17:08:42] <larsk> But we can list it as a known issue.
[17:08:43] <thiago> I don't think there's a fix. I think it's a documentation/porting guide issue
[17:08:48] <thiago> and "write better code" case
[17:08:52] <thiago> yes
[17:09:21] <carewolf> we also have a problem with b2qt for qtwebengine, but since it apparently isn't packaged, I assume it is a non-blocker and we can fix in 6.3.2
[17:09:24] <carewolf> 6.2.1
[17:09:26] <larsk> I think we can fix it for old datastream versions. Certainly for reading, most likely also for writing.
[17:09:44] <thiago> it's unfortunate that we needed the typedefs because of the comma in templates
[17:10:00] <thiago> -> #qt-labs for the bug technical discussion
[17:10:08] <thiago> but I agree it's not a 6.2.0 blocker either way
[17:10:18] <larsk> well, for Qt 6 the issue is gone. It's only about backwards compat for QDataStream I believe.
[17:10:45] <jaheikki3> carewolf: yeah, let's fix it in Qt 6.2.1 as well. Webengine should be packaged in B2Qt so please add the issue in known issues page as well (https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_6.2.0_Known_Issues)
[17:10:48] <larsk> Ok, so let's remove it from the blocker list.  P1 for 6.2.1 I'd say.
[17:10:56] <jaheikki3> +1
[17:11:36] <jaheikki3> So let's keep the plan and release Qt 6.2.0 with existing content thu 30 Sep as planned
[17:12:09] <jaheikki3> larsk: thiago: could you add something about QTBUG-96916 in known issues page  as well
[17:13:20] <thiago> I think we need it somewhere more permanent than the 6.2.0 Known Issues
[17:13:26] <thiago> but will discuss with lars
[17:14:10] <jaheikki3> thanks!
[17:15:28] <jaheikki3> I think this was all at this time. Let's end this meeting now & have next one Tue 5th October at this same time
[17:15:39] <jaheikki3> Thanks for your participation, bye!
[17:16:41] <frkleint> bye
[17:19:03] <thiago> vye



More information about the Releasing mailing list