[Development] Platform / compiler support

Keith Gardner kgardner at zebraimaging.com
Mon Nov 7 17:24:03 CET 2011


Hi,

When specifying Visual Studio, could you specify the support for x86, IA64, and AMD64 architectures?  I know that supporting a compiler is one thing, but supporting an architecture is another.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: development-bounces+kgardner=zebraimaging.com at qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+kgardner=zebraimaging.com at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Friedemann Kleint
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:46 AM
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Platform / compiler support

Hi,

> Hi,
>
> >It'd be nice to have a list of reference platforms and even better if such platforms had maintainers who'd provide testing results, help fix issues and>generally ensure the platforms are in a working state. Supporting a platform may also have implications on the release process. Anyway, all of that is a>bigger discussion.

I volunteer for Windows/MSVC. Also, I think, we should include/explicitly mention MSVC2010, which is different from MSVC2008 in that it has support for C++11 (read: Using C++11 constructs requires extra checking with this compiler).
We could actually require MSVC2010 as minimum version once Qt 5 reaches release status.

ATM, we still support MinGW/gcc 4.4 and we are looking into supporting MinGW/gcc 4.6 and 64bit versions of it.
But that will probably be limited to qtbase.

Regards,
Friedemann

--
Friedemann Kleint
Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



More information about the Development mailing list