[Development] [Qt5-feedback] 3rdpart platform plugins, tests and CI

Holger Hans Peter Freyther holger at freyther.de
Mon Nov 28 10:07:47 CET 2011


On 11/28/2011 02:53 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote:

> 
> Alternatively, if someone knows of a publicly available and good quality
> caching wrapper or similar for git, please speak up :)

The other alternative is to keep the git clones around. E.g. with the Osmocom
jenkins[1] we have a trivial shell script[2] (it could use an || rm -rf..) to
either update the existing code or to git clone. So I don't really see the
need of why one is forced to throw away a git clone (when there are ways to
properly clean it).



> Holger, have you considered starting to work on these changes?
> The vast majority of the "users" of these scripts (i.e. the people
> submitting changes into Qt - indirect users) will not benefit at all,
> so you cannot expect high prioritization from us.

Yes, I tried to understand what the present perl scripts provide and if it
makes sense to use them. Right now I think the perl scripts add a lot of
complication for little to no gain. I think I will start using the testrunner
script only.



[1] http://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/?
[2] http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/Jenkins



More information about the Development mailing list