[Development] Qt Essentials

[qtnext]

same feeling about QT3D : we can't compare QT3D Feature to for example
ogre3D, but for simple things I use Qt3D since two years and it works fine
for all my needs ... without bugs


2012/8/2 Charley Bay <charleyb123 at gmail.com>

> Agree with Thiago:
>
> For 3D and Location, I have a feeling it's a little premature, but I can't
>> blame you for it. Especially in Location's case, with lots of plugins to
>> be
>> kept in working order, it might be tricky in the current situation.
>>
>> Qt3D might be quite mature, actually, since it's been around for longer
>> and
>> has no platform-specific dependencies other than OpenGL.
>>
>
> I can't blame you for it, and can adapt to the changes.  IMHO they did
> really good work with 3D and it provides high QML value if we can establish
> a solid understanding of its support going forward.  (I really liked 3D
> being in Qt essentials.)
>
> Lars' reasoning on the JS Backend seems solid.
>
> --charley
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120802/bdd3c8fa/attachment.html>