[Development] [Qt-creator] gerrit-speak

Donald Carr sirspudd at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 22:16:23 CET 2012


+1

I have seen some people take serious issue with the phrasing; the iOS
contributions spring to mind, but many people clearly feel publicly
disgraced.
On Dec 13, 2012 12:51 PM, "Jenssen Tim" <Tim.Jenssen at digia.com> wrote:

> ________________________________________
> Von: qt-creator-bounces+tim.jenssen=digia.com at qt-project.org[qt-creator-bounces+tim.jenssen=
> digia.com at qt-project.org]" im Auftrag von "Cristian Tibirna [
> tibirna at kde.org]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2012 18:15
> An: qt-creator at qt-project.org
> Betreff: [Qt-creator] gerrit-speak
>
> > (Rethoric: should this go to a more generic qt list?)
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > (First a side question, is there a more consequent documentation about
> the use
> > of gerrit?)
> >
> > Is it only me that finds the "-1" review default message in gerrit rather
> > irritating?
> >
> > "I would prefer that you didn't submit this"
> >
> > reads to my brain much like "go f*k yourself" without the raw words.
> >
> > I get all the idea of the automating thing and all, and that machines
> have no
> > emotion, but, if I don't miss something obvious (this happens to me
> though...)
> > and if that message is configurable, how about
> >
> > "This requires more work"
> >
> > instead?
>
> +1
> Yes this describes more the workflow how I use that with my colleges.
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121213/5b74e254/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list