[Development] branch namespacing policy?

[Richard Moore]

On 18 December 2012 21:15, Oswald Buddenhagen
<oswald.buddenhagen at digia.com> wrote:
> in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention
> that temporary branches must all have a wip/ prefix.
> a similar convention could be adopted for vendor branches, say a vendor/
> (gasp!) prefix.
>
> go/no-go?

Makes sense - I don't think it really matters which convention we use
as long as we have one. This seems a perfectly reasonable option.

Cheers

Rich.