[Development] branch namespacing policy?
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Dec 18 22:25:26 CET 2012
On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 22.15.04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> moin,
>
> prompted by the discussion about the blackberry branch, i again started
> to wonder about a cleaner separation of the branches.
>
> in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention
> that temporary branches must all have a wip/ prefix.
> a similar convention could be adopted for vendor branches, say a vendor/
> (gasp!) prefix.
>
> go/no-go?
I'd say go.
qtbase already has a lot of branches that will need renaming (ios, winrt,
etc.)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121218/78b5392f/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Development
mailing list