[Development] branch namespacing policy?

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Dec 18 22:25:26 CET 2012


On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 22.15.04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> moin,
> 
> prompted by the discussion about the blackberry branch, i again started
> to wonder about a cleaner separation of the branches.
> 
> in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention
> that temporary branches must all have a wip/ prefix.
> a similar convention could be adopted for vendor branches, say a vendor/
> (gasp!) prefix.
> 
> go/no-go?

I'd say go.

qtbase already has a lot of branches that will need renaming (ios, winrt, 
etc.)
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121218/78b5392f/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Development mailing list