[Development] New QUrl implementation

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Wed Jan 4 16:24:20 CET 2012


On Wednesday, 4 de January de 2012 01.53.44, martin.jones at nokia.com wrote:
> >From the QtDeclarative point of view, apart from having our tests pass, I'd
> >like to see some comparisons in QML load time, using photoviewer as a test
> >case, for example.
> Looks like performance was an important consideration in the new
> implementation, but I'd like to see confirmation :-)

I've run all the benchmarks I could on the photoviewer example. I managed to 
crash my system twice while doing hardware event collection.

The impact of the QUrl changes in the example is: inconclusive

QUrl's contribution to the example is negligible in both cases. The number of 
samples collected in QUrl functions is way too small to enable any kind of 
insight. I cannot even conclude which functions were *called*.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120104/b4da1b72/attachment.sig>


More information about the Development mailing list