[Development] Proposal: Remove QML from Qt's code base (OR: Should it be a requirement that Qt Modules are interoperable?)

[d3fault]

On Jul 3, 2012 10:04 PM, <lorn.potter at nokia.com> wrote:
>
> QML was started long before Nokia bought Trolltech.
>
> To answer your question, my opinion is No, QML should not be removed.
>

Lorn, so you think it should be allowed that Qt Modules are not
interoperable?

Also, did QML in the Trolltech days have javascript hacked on and
forced-JIT in the design? There's a 3rd option that I intentionally didn't
mention that is actually a sensible home for QML: .ui file replacement.
Currently QML depends too much on itself to be a .ui file replacement.
There is no C++ equivalent of much of the functionality in QML, whereas
everything you can do in a .ui file, you can do in C++.

d3fault
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120704/b8c133b5/attachment.html>