[Development] Can we bring back QT += declarative?

Robin Burchell robin+qt at viroteck.net
Thu Jul 19 13:03:55 CEST 2012


On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:58 PM,  <casper.vandonderen at nokia.com> wrote:
> What do we want to do in the examples in that case? Can we there still use
> "QT += qtquick1"?

I'm not sure how that is going to be less confusing. I'd say it's worse.

QDeclarative* classes => old QML
QT += declarative => old QML

QQuick* classes => new QML
QT += quick => new QML

The only part that doesn't fit in that suggestion is the git
repository name, which end-users aren't going to be exposed to. If you
use "quick1", then you have to explain that, well no, actually, quick1
is the same as declarative in past Qt releases, but quick is really
qtquick2, etc...



More information about the Development mailing list