[Development] The place of QML

[Atlant Schmidt]

Samuel:

> It's worth noting that the Qt project is designed to
> be a meritocracy, not a democracy.

  What this ignores, though, is the fact that the *CONSUMERS*
  of the Qt product are not necessarily at all congruent with
  the *DEVELOPERS* of the Qt product. (While there's some
  cross-over, I'll bet there's a lot less than many assume.)

  Qt "the product" may be developed by a meritocracy of devel-
  opers but it damned-well better respond in a more-or-less
  democratic way to the needs/demands of the consumers of the
  product. If it doesn't, those consumers will move on to
  using other frameworks.

                             Atlant


This e-mail and the information, including any attachments, it contains are intended to be a confidential communication only to the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.

Thank you.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.