[Development] QT.module.rpath is not used properly

[Romain Pokrzywka]

Ossi's new version of the change fixes both issues now, it should land soon
hopefully. Thanks for reporting and helping identify the problem!

Regards,
Romain
 On Nov 7, 2012 2:08 AM, "Thomas Senyk" <thomas.senyk at pelagicore.com> wrote:

> On Tue, November 06, 2012 08:21:24 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 06:17:04PM +0100, Thomas Senyk wrote:
> > > I got a self-written mkspec for the rasp-pi and everything is working
> as
> > > expected.
> > >
> > > With one exception, for external applications he is not adding the
> proper
> > >
> > >  -Wl,-rpath,<prefix>
> > >
> > > The problem is that:
> > >   cat /usr/local/Trolltech/Qt5-rasp-pi-2/mkspecs/modules/qt_lib_* |grep
> > >   rpath
> > >
> > > returns nothing.
> >
> > that's not the problem.
> >
> > > If you add a module to "QT" in your project file, qt_functions.prf:93
> will
> add:
> > >  -Wl,-rpath,<SYSROOT!!>/<prefix>
> >
> > *that* is the problem.
> > the fallback path doesn't account for sysroots. and it cannot do that
> > cleanly. so it should be scrapped.
>
> but isn't that what the patch tried to do by using $$[QT_INSTALL_LIBS/raw]
> ?
> QT_.../raw variables are variables "without SYSROOT-prefix", right?
>
> I've no real clue about what qt_module.prf does and how it works ... but if
> it's the one taking care about preparing the installed versions of
> module-pri-
> files then the second part of the patch looks like dealing with the root
> problem. (the fact that QT.module.rpath) is missing.
>
> IMO the problem is not the fallback in qt_function.prf, it's the fact that
> the
> fallback is trigger.
>
>
>
> ... but hey, I'm clearly no expert on the whole
> module-mkspecs-architecture ..
> what ever you decide is good with me as long as I get a proper -rpath in
> the
> end ;)
>
> Greest
> Thomas
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Development mailing list
> > Development at qt-project.org
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121108/42824d69/attachment.html>