[Development] The future of QFuture, and QtConcurrent (was "Is QtConcurrent's code generator still in use?")

[Thiago Macieira]

On sexta-feira, 16 de novembro de 2012 23.46.32, Tony Van Eerd wrote:
> C++1y (ie whatever the next standard might be called) will likely have even
> more threading options. Including an "executor" model where you queue up
> std::functions to be run on background thread(s).  But the background
> threading is "configurable" by the fact that the executor object isn't
> completely hidden from you (like it is with std::async(), etc).
> 
> Maybe we should model something along those lines.  I've used that model
> quite successfully in the past.
> 
> I can probably find the current proposal(s) in the standards committee if
> anyone is interested.

We can't wait for C++1y, but we should instead try and influence it by 
designing something nice.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121116/b1a0262d/attachment.sig>