[Development] Branching 5.0

[Knoll Lars]

I know that branch naming is a possible topic for endless bike shedding. You can always find arguments against a certain name here. In the end it's not the most important thing whether it's called testing or stable. It's the meaning that we as a community associate with the branch name that's important.

But to shorten this: We've had that discussion a couple of months ago, and the names mentioned are the ones we in the end agreed to. let's stick to these. I won't re-open that discussion again.

Lars


On Nov 29, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Joseph Crowell <joseph.w.crowell at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with d3fault on this one.
> 
> On 29/11/2012 1:07 PM, d3fault wrote:
>> "always close to releasable" = testing
>> 
>> -dev
>> -testing
>> -release or stable
>> 
>> eradicates any chance of confusion, regardless of who is "right"
>> 
>> 
>> d3fault
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development