[Development] Co-installation & library naming rules

[Thiago Macieira]

On quinta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2012 17.46.11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > The other thing is, we still need to rename the libraries. Otherwise, we
> > can't  install both sets of *.so files to /usr/lib.
> 
> that's simply not a relevant concern. production libraries can be
> co-installed just fine. and development libraries can live in their
> respective subfolders and be found via the respective -L options (which
> come out of pkg-config - which is why i'm considering making the .pc
> files co-installable out of the box).

I'd simply version the libraries. We already do that on Windows too, for 
example.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121011/48d3e721/attachment.sig>