[Development] RFC: Qt Security Policy

d3fault d3faultdotxbe at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 03:33:00 CEST 2012


Whoops that third one was a typo, should have read "I am" instead of "Am I".
I am clearly not being listened to :-P (and I should have used a
pseudonym to trick your inferior brain(s)). You should not associate
an argument with the person presenting it (even though most do). It is
fallacious.

So can we please discuss security openly? Why is Qt using Open
Governance for some aspects and a closed old fashioned fail model for
another?

d3fault



More information about the Development mailing list