[Development] Alternative Proposal (was: Re: Summary of renaming changes)

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Oct 19 23:35:33 CEST 2012

On sexta-feira, 19 de outubro de 2012 19.32.05, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> I have not personally been much fan of that schema... Thiago, I hope
> your next proposal will not be qmake5.0, qmake5.1 and the like based
> upon some "python precedence".

Even though python does install python3.2 and python3.3, the name that people 
run is "python3", as seen in many scripts:

#!/usr/bin/env python3

So I really don't care if we have qmake5.0, qmake5.1, qmake5.1.2-digia3, so 
long as there's a qmake5 that works and is the official way.

Really, I don't care what qmake5 is and where it points to, so long as:
 a) it exists
 b) it works
 c) it's the official and documented way of creating Qt applications in Qt 5

Any other names are under the customer's taste.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121019/214f96ab/attachment.sig>

More information about the Development mailing list