[Development] New proposal for the tool naming

[Stephen Kelly]

On Sunday, October 21, 2012 10:51:12 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > All correct? Did I miss anything?
> 
> More or less. I was thinking it might work if it's inside the qtbase
> sources. 

> If distros are going to provide Qt 5, they need to compile qtbase
> anyway. The only thing we need is to provide a way for the wrapper from qt5
> to be suppressed if the qt6 one is being installed.

Something for packagers to chime in on.

> > Preferably also list goals and non goals. For example Sune's concern that
> > I
> > linked to before seems to have become a non-goal. Please make those things
> > explicit.
> 
> What concern?

See my mail from this morning in reply to you. It relates to user support.

Thanks,

-- 
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ **
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121021/eb5d1011/attachment.sig>