[Development] New proposal for the tool naming

[Thiago Macieira]

On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 19.02.38, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 22.10.2012, 18:49, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:
> > I just have no idea how one thing relates to the other. Can you share a
> > little more about how this solves a problem that you were seeing?
> 
> It provides a sane way of coexisting for 2 moc executables for the same Qt
> version. E.g. someone can register different moc executable for some Qt
> version and it will work immediately with old makefiles.
> 
> Otherwise the only option is to overwrite existing moc with no fallback
> possibility.
> 
> It also makes possible to have one moc working for several Qt versions.

That was not part of my plans and I will not add that feature. There's exactly 
one moc executable per Qt version. If you want to change to a moc-llvm 
implementation, you need to do renaming of files, just like you did before.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121022/9cec7f49/attachment.sig>