[Development] Playground project request

[Sandro Andrade]

Sending again to the mailing list, as suggested.
--
Sandro

On Friday 31 August 2012 21:53:44 you wrote:
> My initial thoughts are "why not!", but can you adhere to the Qt Project's
> CLA as this is part of you PhD?

Yes, we're fine with it. There're no specific licensing expectations about it.
I just wouldn't like to have an eclipse-based tool, it's more a kind of
personal effort.

> The CLA is in place to both protect users of the code, but also to allow
> relicensing of the code so it's usable in commercial projects, where GPL or
> LGPL code would not work.

> I suggest you read the CLA and discuss it with your university first.

Anyway, I've just gone through the CLA. Nothing to be afraid of :)
I and my advisor are somehow used to floss-based academic projects
and there is no parterships with potential conflictings parts.

Do you need some specific information to proceed ?

TIA,
Sandro

>
> --
> Sent from my Nokia N9
>
> On 8/31/12 16:22 ext Sandro Andrade wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm starting the development of a Qt-based implementation of OMG's MOF
> specification,
> as part of my phd project. As far as I know there is no C++/Qt
> implementation of MOF,
> only the Java ones based on Eclipse Modelling Framework
> (which uses ecore instead of pure MOF).
>
> IMO, that could be useful in the future to support some model-driven
> capabilities in Qt
> Creator like automatic code generation from UML, early architectural
> analysis (my current focus), etc. I'd
> like to work upstream in Qt5 instead of providing a separate library.
> In addition, Qt MOF
> (or whatever it get named) could also be the foundation for a UML2.4.1
> supporting version
> of Umbrello or other tools interested in model-driven approaches.
>
> So, what do you think ?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Sandro
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development