[Development] Playground project request

[lars.knoll at nokia.com]

Sorry, this drowned in my mailbox. I'm ok with a QtUML playground project.

Sergio, can you help setting it up?

Thanks,
Lars


On Sep 9, 2012, at 6:25 AM, ext Sandro Andrade <sandroandrade at kde.org> wrote:

> Sending again to the mailing list, as suggested.
> --
> Sandro
> 
> On Friday 31 August 2012 21:53:44 you wrote:
>> My initial thoughts are "why not!", but can you adhere to the Qt Project's
>> CLA as this is part of you PhD?
> 
> Yes, we're fine with it. There're no specific licensing expectations about it.
> I just wouldn't like to have an eclipse-based tool, it's more a kind of
> personal effort.
> 
>> The CLA is in place to both protect users of the code, but also to allow
>> relicensing of the code so it's usable in commercial projects, where GPL or
>> LGPL code would not work.
> 
>> I suggest you read the CLA and discuss it with your university first.
> 
> Anyway, I've just gone through the CLA. Nothing to be afraid of :)
> I and my advisor are somehow used to floss-based academic projects
> and there is no parterships with potential conflictings parts.
> 
> Do you need some specific information to proceed ?
> 
> TIA,
> Sandro
> 
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from my Nokia N9
>> 
>> On 8/31/12 16:22 ext Sandro Andrade wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> I'm starting the development of a Qt-based implementation of OMG's MOF
>> specification,
>> as part of my phd project. As far as I know there is no C++/Qt
>> implementation of MOF,
>> only the Java ones based on Eclipse Modelling Framework
>> (which uses ecore instead of pure MOF).
>> 
>> IMO, that could be useful in the future to support some model-driven
>> capabilities in Qt
>> Creator like automatic code generation from UML, early architectural
>> analysis (my current focus), etc. I'd
>> like to work upstream in Qt5 instead of providing a separate library.
>> In addition, Qt MOF
>> (or whatever it get named) could also be the foundation for a UML2.4.1
>> supporting version
>> of Umbrello or other tools interested in model-driven approaches.
>> 
>> So, what do you think ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Sandro
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development