[Development] Dropping XP?

Tony Van Eerd tvaneerd at blackberry.com
Tue Dec 10 18:13:01 CET 2013


- I think there is cleanup that could be done.
- I think it is still too early to do so.  I'm still running XP! (true, not for much longer...)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: development-bounces+tvaneerd=blackberry.com at qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+tvaneerd=blackberry.com at qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:29 AM
> To: development at qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Dropping XP?
> 
> On terça-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2013 12:30:23, Knight Andrew wrote:
> > I don't think there's much benefit to rushing into this. In the cases
> where
> > WinRT's native API is wildly different than Win32, we can use a new
> CPP
> > file. Apart from a cleaner codebase, I don't see much benefit in
> ripping
> > out code before Qt 6 - leaving it there allows the community to
> continue
> > trying to support Windows XP.
> 
> That's why I asked if there's something that makes our codebase cleaner
> by
> cleaning up. Remember when we dropped non-Unicode Windows support? It
> cleaned
> up a lot of #ifdef UNICODE and QT_WA() usages.
> 
> John has one point: he could remove the fallback code for the timezone
> support.
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.




More information about the Development mailing list