[Development] Dropping XP?

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Dec 10 16:29:23 CET 2013

On terça-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2013 12:30:23, Knight Andrew wrote:
> I don't think there's much benefit to rushing into this. In the cases where
> WinRT's native API is wildly different than Win32, we can use a new CPP
> file. Apart from a cleaner codebase, I don't see much benefit in ripping
> out code before Qt 6 - leaving it there allows the community to continue
> trying to support Windows XP.

That's why I asked if there's something that makes our codebase cleaner by 
cleaning up. Remember when we dropped non-Unicode Windows support? It cleaned 
up a lot of #ifdef UNICODE and QT_WA() usages.

John has one point: he could remove the fallback code for the timezone 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20131210/2b5490e8/attachment.sig>

More information about the Development mailing list