[Development] Code Coverage of QtBase - new report available online
Sébastien Fricker
fricker at froglogic.com
Fri Feb 1 11:26:20 CET 2013
>
> qtsdk master doesn't make sense for daily reports because it only moves during
> release times. It would need to be the qt5.git repository and we go back to a
> choice of the three branches.
So you would prefer to track the coverage of the dev branch of each module?
But this would not be relevant for qtsdk, since qtsdk does not principally use the same version of the modules.
I'm principally open to provide an other coverage report but we need to define what we want to see.
For example, I can imagine that we compare QtBase dev branch with the latest version of QtBase used in QtSdk.
This could help for the decision of switching to the newest version of this module in QtSdk.
More information about the Development
mailing list